Connect with us

Politics

Mwengi Mutuse: The Political Maverick or Master of Contradiction?

Mwengi Mutuse is a politician who is marked by bold moves and notable contradictions. His effort to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has thrust him into the national spotlight as a vocal critic of government misconduct. Yet, his backing of the controversial Finance Bill 2024, which imposed heavy financial burdens on ordinary Kenyans, casts doubt on his true commitment to public welfare and accountability.

Published

on

Mwengi Mutuse’s political moves mirror a broader pattern in Kenyan politics, where shifting alliances and fluid stances on key issues are common. His journey highlights the complexities of governance in Kenya, where politicians often balance the interests of the public with the need to safeguard their own political ambitions.

:Hon. Mwengi Mutuse has swiftly risen to prominence in Kenya’s political landscape with his audacious move to table an impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua in 2024. However, this same MP, who presents himself as a crusader for accountability, also backed the controversial Finance Bill 2024, which was deemed anti-people and sparked public outrage. This contradiction—championing public integrity while supporting a bill that burdened ordinary citizens—raises questions about Mutuse’s political integrity and long-term ambitions. Is he a true reformer or another player in Kenya’s unpredictable political chess game?

 By Charles Wachira

In a country where politics often follows the unpredictable rhythm of shifting alliances and calculated moves, Hon. Mwengi Mutuse’s decision to table an impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua grabbed national attention in 2024. The first-term MP for Kibwezi West, Mutuse, rose quickly through Kenya’s political ranks, cementing himself as a bold and daring voice. However, the same MP who positioned himself as a reformer in challenging Deputy President Gachagua was also a key supporter of the controversial Finance Bill 2024—an unpopular piece of legislation that sparked protests and was labeled as “anti-people” by its critics.

This paradox of championing both public accountability and supporting a bill that heavily taxed ordinary Kenyans raises the question: What does Mutuse truly stand for? Is he a principled politician, or does he represent the same contradictions that have long characterized Kenyan politics?

A Rising Star with Complications

Hon. Mwengi Mutuse’s political journey is impressive. Elected to Parliament in 2022 under the Maendeleo Chap Chap party, Mutuse quickly became known for his legal expertise and bold stance on governance issues. Prior to his national political career, he worked as Chief of Staff to Machakos Governor Alfred Mutua, honing his understanding of public administration and county-level politics.

However, his image as a champion of accountability was tarnished when he threw his support behind the Finance Bill 2024, a deeply controversial piece of legislation that proposed increased taxes on fuel and basic commodities. Despite public outcry and widespread protests, Mutuse voted in favor of the bill, aligning himself with the government’s stance, which was largely seen as punishing the already economically strained population.

The bill sparked massive opposition across the country, and many viewed it as detrimental to the common mwananchi (citizen). Ironically, Mutuse, who had presented himself as an advocate for the people’s interests, supported the bill, contributing to the growing economic burden on ordinary Kenyans. This raised eyebrows and sowed doubt about his commitment to fighting for the average citizen’s welfare.

Eventually, President William Ruto, responding to public dissatisfaction and political pressure, subtly shelved the Finance Bill. But by then, the damage to Mutuse’s image had been done. This created a perception that the MP was willing to toe the government line, even at the expense of public interest.

A Contradictory Move: The Impeachment of Gachagua

In the wake of his controversial vote for the Finance Bill, Mutuse’s bold decision to table an impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua appeared to some as an attempt at political redemption. Mutuse accused Gachagua of gross misconduct, violation of the Constitution, and making inflammatory statements that threatened national unity. The motion also touched on allegations of corruption surrounding Gachagua, echoing the frustrations of a public tired of scandals in high office.

However, Mutuse’s impeachment motion has been met with skepticism. How can a politician who supported a bill widely seen as oppressive to the public now claim to be fighting for accountability and good governance? Critics argue that the impeachment bid may be less about principles and more about opportunism. In challenging a powerful figure like Gachagua, Mutuse has perhaps calculated that aligning himself with those opposing Gachagua within the political establishment could raise his own profile and build alliances for the future.

A Calculated Gamble or Genuine Concern?

While Mutuse’s impeachment motion is unlikely to succeed due to Gachagua’s strong backing within government ranks, the move does reveal his strategic thinking. By positioning himself against the Deputy President, Mutuse casts himself as a bold challenger to the establishment. Yet, his actions regarding the Finance Bill undermine the narrative that he is a politician of integrity and accountability.

This duality—being both a supporter of policies that hurt the public and a critic of high-level corruption—makes it difficult to pin down Mutuse’s political philosophy. Is he driven by genuine concern for the state of governance, or is he merely playing the political chess game, maneuvering for personal gain and future influence?

The impeachment motion could also be seen as a response to growing discontent among opposition supporters who view Gachagua as a divisive figure. In publicly challenging him, Mutuse may hope to tap into the frustrations of Kenyans who feel left out by the ruling Kenya Kwanza coalition. However, many Kenyans remain wary of politicians who seem to switch their positions when it suits them.

The Broader Implications for Kenyan Politics

Mwengi Mutuse’s political maneuvering reflects a broader trend in Kenyan politics, where alliances shift quickly, and positions on key issues can be fluid. His story underscores the complex nature of governance in Kenya, where politicians often find themselves walking a fine line between serving the public and protecting their own political careers.

For many observers, Mutuse’s impeachment motion will be remembered not for its legal or constitutional implications but as a reflection of the contradictions within Kenya’s political system. On one hand, he has shown the courage to take on the Deputy President, a move that undoubtedly raised his national profile. On the other hand, his support of the Finance Bill demonstrates that he is not immune to the pressures of political expediency.

In the eyes of his critics, Mutuse is not the principled reformer he claims to be. The impeachment motion, they argue, is less about safeguarding the Constitution and more about gaining political mileage. Yet for his supporters, Mutuse remains a fresh face in Kenyan politics, someone who, despite his missteps, has shown the willingness to challenge the powers that be.

Conclusion

Hon. Mwengi Mutuse is a politician defined by both bold action and troubling contradictions. His attempt to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua places him in the spotlight as a vocal critic of government misconduct. However, his support for the Finance Bill 2024, which placed significant burdens on ordinary Kenyans, raises doubts about his commitment to public welfare and accountability.

As Mutuse navigates the turbulent waters of Kenyan politics, his ability to reconcile these contradictions will likely determine his future success. Whether he emerges as a true reformer or is remembered as just another politician playing the system remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Mwengi Mutuse is a figure to watch as Kenya continues to grapple with the complex balance of power, governance, and public accountability.

Keywords:Mwengi Mutuse impeachment motion:Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua:Kenya Finance Bill 2024:Kenyan political contradictions:Public accountability in Kenya politics

Charles Wachira, Managing Editor of businessworld, has disproportionately worked as a foreign correspondent in Nairobi, Kenya. Formerly an East Africa correspondent with bloomberg, covering the business beat he has since been published by a legion of other authoritative global news platforms including Global Finance Magazine, Toward Freedom, Earth Island Journal, and Dialogue. earth and so on. He is also a co-author of, Success to Significance, a biography of pre-eminent global industrialist and renowned philanthropist Dr. Manu Chandaraia. He’s an alumnus of the University of Nairobi and Nairobi School.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

William Ruto’s First Year: Promises Made, Struggles Persist

President Ruto cannot fulfil his manifesto unless he curbs runaway corruption and holds culprits accountable. The rule of law requires recovering proceeds of crime and prosecuting offenders for economic sabotage. This strategy would reduce the need to overburden Kenyans with taxes and additional borrowing.

Published

on

President William Ruto must move beyond ethno-regional appointments to achieve legitimacy and drive transformation. He needs to ideologically reconnect with and uplift the “hustler nation,” the marginalized group that brought him to power. Without this, he risks facing an intensely contested reelection bid, similar to his predecessors.

: Kenya’s President William Ruto faces challenges in fulfilling promises on governance, the economy, and national cohesion. Can he turn things around before 2027?

By Dr.Westen Shilaho

It’s more than a year since President William Ruto was sworn into office as Kenya’s fifth president. 

He took office during a period of rising food and fuel prices, high unemployment, and a troubling debt burden in Kenya.

 During the election campaign, Ruto promised to fix an economy afflicted by corruption and ineptitude. He promised to entrench good governance and place the poor at the centre of economic policy.

 He pledged to address ethnicised politics and to uphold constitutionalism and the rule of law.

Ruto’s promises were significant. The rule of law and constitutionalism are key to economic planning and development, governance and equitable sharing of national resources. 

They are the guardrails against impunity, democratic backsliding, lawlessness and political instability. 

Throughout Kenya’s postcolonial period, the political elite have exploited ethnicity to obtain power at the expense of the collective well-being and social cohesion.

 Elite entitlement has also weakened state institutions, leading to corruption and impunity.

I have studied democratic transitions, conflict and state building and elections in Africa.

 My 2018 book examined how the political class had exploited ethnicity for political and economic advantage, resulting in weak and even dysfunctional state institutions in Kenya.

In his election campaign, Ruto identified the major issues that required urgent attention.

 He addressed issues that needed swift action without constitutional changes, such as thawing the tension between the executive and the judiciary, decoupling the police finances from the executive, and taking port operations back to the coastal city of Mombasa from the inland town of Naivasha.

 But resolving Kenya’s economic hardships has proved a hard nut to crack, as his 9 November 2023 State of the Nation address acknowledged. Just over a year since he was sworn in, Ruto is no nearer to turning the Kenyan ship around.

ECONOMIC TURBULENCE

As a candidate, Ruto portrayed himself as an outsider to Kenya’s power matrix who was best placed to improve the living conditions of the poor and excluded. But the economy has not improved under his watch. If anything, living conditions have worsened.

The cost of living is higher after a steep increase in the petrol price and the local currency’s loss of value. Ruto’s government has imposed new and increased taxes on Kenyans, ostensibly to reduce or remove the need for external borrowing.

The government was quick to remove fuel and food subsidies but has been slow to address government wastage.

The government’s key strategy was to subsidise fertiliser to boost harvests and achieve food security. It remains to be seen whether this will happen. 

More deliberate measures are required to turn around agriculture as the mainstay of the economy.

On the question of centring the poor and marginalised in governance, Ruto focused on the financial sector. The government rolled out the “Hustler Fund” to make credit more affordable.

But the fund’s impact on overall living standards through job creation, for instance, is likely to be cancelled out by a punitive tax regime and a struggling economy.

RULE OF LAW

Ruto’s first public event as president was to approve the appointment of six judges left in limbo by his predecessor, Uhuru Kenyatta. He also made good on his promise to allocate more funding to the judiciary.

However, to entrench the rule of law and constitutionalism calls for more than this. Judicial officers must act with utmost integrity. To affirm equality before the law, errant senior state officers and the political elite must face the law and if found guilty sanctioned decisively.

The Kenyan judiciary is still bedevilled by corruption that impedes access to justice. Disturbingly, it is seen as more inclined to punish the poor while letting the rich and political elite act with impunity.

 Ruto himself has obeyed court rulings that went against him, unlike under Kenyatta, when disregard for the law was the norm. Critics, however, including the Law Society of Kenya, have accused his administration of disobeying court orders like his predecessor.

Ruto spoke out against extrajudicial and summary executions and enforced disappearances perfected by the police over the years. 

He sought to accord the police financial and operational autonomy. Thus he transferred accounting for the police budget to the police as he had promised.

Despite these changes, a culture of impunity and lack of transparency continues to undermine the Kenyan police. Extrajudicial executions continue. The police must be placed under civilian oversight as envisaged under the constitution.

The failure to set up a commission of inquiry into state capture under his predecessor, as promised during campaigns, dented Ruto’s commitment to the fight against corruption. A year later, a commission of inquiry has not been formed and the issue seems to have been abandoned altogether.

It is unlikely that Ruto will fulfil his manifesto unless he reins in runaway corruption and the culprits are held to account.

 The rule of law demands that proceeds of crime be recovered and offenders charged for economic sabotage. This approach would obviate the need to burden Kenyans with taxes and more borrowing.

NATIONAL COHESION

Appointments to government positions have been undermined by the age-old problems of recycling appointees, patronage, nepotism and ethnicity. Just as worrying are senior government officials publicly advancing exclusionary ethnic politics with impunity. Ruto must rein them in.

It is also a setback that Ruto acceded to talks to assuage the opposition elite who had resorted to violent protests against his historic victory. These elitist self-serving talks could lead to constitutional amendments creating more political positions under a cynically flawed logic that this approach enhances national cohesion.

 This is an about-turn on Ruto’s part.

Ultimately national cohesion is Ruto’s pressing challenge.

 Kenya is divided on many fronts – economic, ethnic, regional and religious – a legacy of previous governments. 

Ruto needs to look beyond ethno-regional appointments. For legitimacy and transformation, he needs to ideologically reconnect with and dignify the “hustler nation”, the disenfranchised constituency that propelled him into power. Bar this, he could face an intensely contested reelection bid like his predecessors.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rigathi Gachagua’s Impeachment: A Political Conundrum for Ruto’s Administration

Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s impeachment has transformed Kenya’s political landscape, marking the first event of its kind under the 2010 Constitution.

Published

on

RigatheGachagua’s removal exposes the volatility of Kenyan politics, where regional and ethnic dynamics frequently influence shifting loyalties. Analysts urge Ruto to tread carefully to secure his hold over Mt. Kenya, a region vital to his electoral prospects.

: Explore the political crisis after Rigathi Gachagua’s impeachment, its impact on William Ruto’s leadership, and the road to Kenya’s 2027 elections.

The impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has upended Kenya’s political landscape, marking the first instance of such an event under the 2010 Constitution.

Accused of divisive politics and judicial interference, Gachagua’s ousting has ignited significant political tensions, particularly within the populous Mt. Kenya region, which has been a cornerstone of President William Ruto’s support base.

Gachagua has vocally criticised Ruto, describing his former ally as “vicious” and accusing him of orchestrating the impeachment.

 In a fiery statement, Gachagua claimed, “The man I helped to become president has betrayed me,” while also alleging threats to his safety.

 His impeachment has left the deputy presidency in limbo, with a court temporarily halting the appointment of Interior Minister Kithure Kindiki as his replacement.

Impact on Ruto’s Political Strategy

This political rift presents a dual challenge for Ruto. On one hand, it exposes cracks within the ruling coalition, with some legislators fearing backlash in their constituencies for supporting Gachagua’s removal.

 On the other, it provides opposition leaders an opportunity to capitalise on perceived disunity within the government, potentially reshaping alliances as the 2027 elections approach.

Moreover, Gachagua’s removal has highlighted the volatile nature of Kenyan politics, where loyalty often shifts based on regional and ethnic dynamics.

Analysts believe Ruto must now tread carefully to maintain his hold over Mt. Kenya, a region critical to his electoral prospects.

The Way Forward

The administration must immediately stabilize governance by resolving the court dispute over Gachagua’s replacement or reconciling with dissenting factions.

Political analysts suggest that Ruto should focus on unifying his coalition and delivering tangible results to counter opposition narratives.

As Kenya moves closer to the 2027 polls, this episode underscores the importance of political cohesion and strategic messaging. Whether Ruto can overcome this challenge or face further fallout will significantly shape the country’s political trajectory.

Continue Reading

Politics

Kenya Under Ruto: Transformative Leadership or Mounting Challenges?

Ruto’s policies have sparked mixed reactions on the social front. While he has taken a prominent role in addressing global challenges like climate change—evident in hosting a landmark summit that secured billions in clean energy investments—critics contend that his focus on international priorities has overshadowed pressing domestic concerns. Issues such as food insecurity and unemployment remain unresolved, leaving many Kenyans feeling neglected despite the administration’s ambitious global commitments.

Published

on

President Ruto has portrayed himself as a champion of reform, prioritizing transparency and economic restructuring to address systemic challenges. However, his administration grapples with the complex task of providing immediate support to struggling Kenyans while ensuring sustainable fiscal policies for long-term stability.

: Analyse President William Ruto’s leadership in Kenya, focusing on economic reforms, political strategies, and social challenges shaping the nation’s future.

Kenya’s President William Ruto, in office since September 2022, has faced mixed reviews regarding his leadership, particularly on economic, political, and social fronts.

 Bold reforms, mounting challenges, and a mixed reception among citizens have marked his administration.

Economic Landscape

Ruto inherited an economy grappling with high debt levels ($69 billion), inflation, and global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine war.

 Despite efforts to stabilise the economy, including introducing new taxes and eliminating fuel subsidies to secure loans from the IMF and World Bank, these measures have strained ordinary Kenyans.

 Household essentials, including sugar and beans, saw price hikes up to 61% and 30%, respectively. Inflation moderated to 6.7% in August 2023, but economic growth is projected to be slower than the 4.8% recorded in 2022​

.Key initiatives such as the “Hustler Fund,” aimed at empowering small-scale entrepreneurs, have not delivered the expected outcomes, with some analysts like Ken Gichinga calling Ruto’s economic policies “ineffective.”

 However, Ruto has also promoted local manufacturing and reduced reliance on imports to support job creation.​

.

Political Strategy

On the political front, Ruto has shown determination to fight corruption.

 His administration has introduced measures to track government spending and eliminate payroll fraud through a Unified Personal Identification system.

 He has also emphasised accountability, stating, “We shall levy a surcharge against any officer who causes a loss of public resources.” However, critics question the effectiveness of these reforms, especially in light of continued economic hardships​

Ruto’s administration faced opposition-led protests over rising living costs, which turned deadly, leaving 50 people dead. 

These tensions underscore the political divisions and challenges in delivering tangible benefits to Kenyans​

.Social Impact

Socially, Ruto’s policies have had polarising effects. While he champions global issues like climate change, hosting a major summit that attracted billions in clean energy investments, critics argue that his focus on international engagements has left domestic issues, such as food insecurity and unemployment, unresolved.

 Analysts like Nerima Wako-Ojiwa emphasise that many Kenyans are now struggling with basic needs like food, highlighting a disconnect between the administration’s priorities and grassroots realities​

.Broader Context and Future

Ruto has positioned himself as a reformer, focusing on transparency and economic restructuring. 

However, his administration faces the twin challenge of delivering immediate relief to struggling Kenyans while maintaining long-term fiscal responsibility. 

Supporters like Joseph Mwiti argue that transformative policies take time to bear fruit, reflecting cautious optimism about Ruto’s leadership.​

In sum, President Ruto’s tenure has been characterised by ambitious reforms and significant headwinds. The success of his administration will depend on balancing economic recovery, political stability, and social equity in the coming years.

Continue Reading

Trending