Connect with us

Politics

Raila Odinga: Kenya’s Opposition Stalwart or Compromised Democrat?

Raila Odinga’s evolving role highlights concerns over Kenya’s weakening opposition, as his alignment with the ruling party raises fears of unchecked executive power and diminished democratic accountability

Published

on

raila
Raila Odinga's legacy reflects both his unwavering fight for democracy and the complexities of his political alliances. While celebrated for championing multi-party politics and electoral justice, his partnerships, like the handshake with Uhuru Kenyatta and alliance with William Ruto, spark debate over pragmatism versus principle


: Explore Raila Odinga’s paradoxical political journey, from championing
democracy to alliances with ruling parties, and its implications for Kenya’s
opposition.

Raila Odinga is a towering figure in Kenya’s political landscape, often regarded as the
face of the opposition and a champion for democratic reforms.

However, his recent moves, including leading the Orange Democratic Movement
(ODM) to collaborate with President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance (UDA),
have raised questions about his commitment to opposition politics and his legacy as a
Democrat.

A Life Defined by Struggles for Democracy

Odinga’s journey in Kenyan politics is marked by resilience and controversy.
A son of the late Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, Kenya’s first Vice President, Raila has been
at the forefront of the country’s fight for democracy since the early 1980s.

In 1982, Raila was arrested and detained without trial for his alleged involvement in a
coup attempt against President Daniel arap Moi’s government.

His detention lasted six years, a period during which he endured immense personal
and political sacrifices. Speaking about this time, Raila once said:
“I was ready to sacrifice everything, including my freedom, for a Kenya
where democracy and human rights are respected.”

After his release in 1988, Raila continued to push for multi-party democracy, enduring
harassment and surveillance. His activism culminated in a forced self-exile to Norway in
1991.

From Opposition Leader to Coalition Builder

Raila returned to Kenya in the early 1990s as the clamour for multi-party democracy
grew. He became a key figure in the opposition, eventually forming the National
Development Party (NDP)

In 2001, Raila controversially merged his party with Moi’s ruling Kenya African National
Union (KANU) and secured a ministerial position. However, the alliance quickly
unravelled.

By 2002, Raila and other KANU rebels had walked out, joining the opposition that
ultimately ended Moi’s 24-year rule.
This episode is often cited as evidence of Raila’s pragmatism—or
opportunism—depending on one’s perspective.

“Raila is a master strategist. He knows when to strike and when to retreat,”
said political analyst Mutahi Ngunyi in 2018.

The 2007 Elections and the Grand Coalition Government

Raila’s most notable battle for the presidency came in 2007 when he ran against
incumbent Mwai Kibaki.

The disputed election led to widespread violence, resulting in over 1,200 deaths and
displacing hundreds of thousands.

A mediated agreement by Kofi Annan led to the formation of a grand coalition
government in 2008, with Raila serving as Prime Minister.

This period was seen as a triumph of compromise, but it also blurred the lines between
government and opposition.

The Handshake with Uhuru Kenyatta

Raila’s opposition credentials took another turn in March 2018, when he and then-
President Uhuru Kenyatta announced a truce known as the “Handshake.”

The deal brought political stability after the divisive 2017 elections but effectively
sidelined the opposition.

Critics argued that Raila had abandoned his watchdog role. Deputy President William
Ruto, then in opposition to the handshake, remarked:

“The handshake was a ploy to kill opposition politics in Kenya. Raila joined
government and left Kenyans without a voice.”


Collaboration with President Ruto

After losing his fifth presidential bid in August 2022, Raila initially rejected William Ruto’s victory, citing electoral irregularities.

However, in October 2024, ODM announced its decision to collaborate with Ruto’s
UDA party, forming what has been termed a “broad-based government.”

This move has ignited fierce debate about Raila’s commitment to opposition politics.
For many, it mirrors his earlier partnerships with Moi and Uhuru, which were seen as
betrayals of his democratic ideals.

Political analyst Herman Manyora argues:
“Raila’s latest move is a departure from his traditional role as the voice of the
people. It undermines the opposition’s ability to hold the government
accountable.”

What Does This Mean for Raila’s Legacy?

Raila Odinga’s legacy is one of paradoxes. On one hand, his sacrifices for democracy
are undeniable.

He strengthened his enduring appeal by fighting for multi-party politics and relentlessly
pursuing justice in Kenya’s electoral processes.

On the other hand, his political manoeuvres—whether the handshake with Uhuru or the
current alliance with Ruto—cast doubt on his commitment to opposition ideals.
Some view these alliances as a reflection of political pragmatism, while others see them
as a dilution of democratic principles.

The Broader Impact on Kenya’s Democracy

Raila’s shifting roles underscore a broader issue: the weakening of Kenya’s opposition.
With the opposition leader now aligned with the ruling party, there are fears of
unchecked executive power and declining democratic accountability.

Veteran lawyer and former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga warned in a recent interview:
“Democracy dies in darkness. When the opposition is compromised, the
people are left vulnerable to government excesses.”


Conclusion

Raila Odinga’s political journey is emblematic of Kenya’s turbulent democracy. While his
contributions to expanding democratic space are significant, his recent moves raise
critical questions about his legacy and the future of opposition politics in Kenya.

As Kenya navigates these uncertain waters, the onus may now fall on civil society and
grassroots movements to fill the void left by an increasingly collaborative opposition.
The question remains: Can Raila still be the people’s voice, or has he become another
player in the game of power consolidation?

Charles Wachira, Managing Editor of businessworld, has disproportionately worked as a foreign correspondent in Nairobi, Kenya. Formerly an East Africa correspondent with bloomberg, covering the business beat he has since been published by a legion of other authoritative global news platforms including Global Finance Magazine, Toward Freedom, Earth Island Journal, and Dialogue. earth and so on. He is also a co-author of, Success to Significance, a biography of pre-eminent global industrialist and renowned philanthropist Dr. Manu Chandaraia. He’s an alumnus of the University of Nairobi and Nairobi School.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

William Ruto’s First Year: Promises Made, Struggles Persist

President Ruto cannot fulfil his manifesto unless he curbs runaway corruption and holds culprits accountable. The rule of law requires recovering proceeds of crime and prosecuting offenders for economic sabotage. This strategy would reduce the need to overburden Kenyans with taxes and additional borrowing.

Published

on

President William Ruto must move beyond ethno-regional appointments to achieve legitimacy and drive transformation. He needs to ideologically reconnect with and uplift the “hustler nation,” the marginalized group that brought him to power. Without this, he risks facing an intensely contested reelection bid, similar to his predecessors.

: Kenya’s President William Ruto faces challenges in fulfilling promises on governance, the economy, and national cohesion. Can he turn things around before 2027?

By Dr.Westen Shilaho

It’s more than a year since President William Ruto was sworn into office as Kenya’s fifth president. 

He took office during a period of rising food and fuel prices, high unemployment, and a troubling debt burden in Kenya.

 During the election campaign, Ruto promised to fix an economy afflicted by corruption and ineptitude. He promised to entrench good governance and place the poor at the centre of economic policy.

 He pledged to address ethnicised politics and to uphold constitutionalism and the rule of law.

Ruto’s promises were significant. The rule of law and constitutionalism are key to economic planning and development, governance and equitable sharing of national resources. 

They are the guardrails against impunity, democratic backsliding, lawlessness and political instability. 

Throughout Kenya’s postcolonial period, the political elite have exploited ethnicity to obtain power at the expense of the collective well-being and social cohesion.

 Elite entitlement has also weakened state institutions, leading to corruption and impunity.

I have studied democratic transitions, conflict and state building and elections in Africa.

 My 2018 book examined how the political class had exploited ethnicity for political and economic advantage, resulting in weak and even dysfunctional state institutions in Kenya.

In his election campaign, Ruto identified the major issues that required urgent attention.

 He addressed issues that needed swift action without constitutional changes, such as thawing the tension between the executive and the judiciary, decoupling the police finances from the executive, and taking port operations back to the coastal city of Mombasa from the inland town of Naivasha.

 But resolving Kenya’s economic hardships has proved a hard nut to crack, as his 9 November 2023 State of the Nation address acknowledged. Just over a year since he was sworn in, Ruto is no nearer to turning the Kenyan ship around.

ECONOMIC TURBULENCE

As a candidate, Ruto portrayed himself as an outsider to Kenya’s power matrix who was best placed to improve the living conditions of the poor and excluded. But the economy has not improved under his watch. If anything, living conditions have worsened.

The cost of living is higher after a steep increase in the petrol price and the local currency’s loss of value. Ruto’s government has imposed new and increased taxes on Kenyans, ostensibly to reduce or remove the need for external borrowing.

The government was quick to remove fuel and food subsidies but has been slow to address government wastage.

The government’s key strategy was to subsidise fertiliser to boost harvests and achieve food security. It remains to be seen whether this will happen. 

More deliberate measures are required to turn around agriculture as the mainstay of the economy.

On the question of centring the poor and marginalised in governance, Ruto focused on the financial sector. The government rolled out the “Hustler Fund” to make credit more affordable.

But the fund’s impact on overall living standards through job creation, for instance, is likely to be cancelled out by a punitive tax regime and a struggling economy.

RULE OF LAW

Ruto’s first public event as president was to approve the appointment of six judges left in limbo by his predecessor, Uhuru Kenyatta. He also made good on his promise to allocate more funding to the judiciary.

However, to entrench the rule of law and constitutionalism calls for more than this. Judicial officers must act with utmost integrity. To affirm equality before the law, errant senior state officers and the political elite must face the law and if found guilty sanctioned decisively.

The Kenyan judiciary is still bedevilled by corruption that impedes access to justice. Disturbingly, it is seen as more inclined to punish the poor while letting the rich and political elite act with impunity.

 Ruto himself has obeyed court rulings that went against him, unlike under Kenyatta, when disregard for the law was the norm. Critics, however, including the Law Society of Kenya, have accused his administration of disobeying court orders like his predecessor.

Ruto spoke out against extrajudicial and summary executions and enforced disappearances perfected by the police over the years. 

He sought to accord the police financial and operational autonomy. Thus he transferred accounting for the police budget to the police as he had promised.

Despite these changes, a culture of impunity and lack of transparency continues to undermine the Kenyan police. Extrajudicial executions continue. The police must be placed under civilian oversight as envisaged under the constitution.

The failure to set up a commission of inquiry into state capture under his predecessor, as promised during campaigns, dented Ruto’s commitment to the fight against corruption. A year later, a commission of inquiry has not been formed and the issue seems to have been abandoned altogether.

It is unlikely that Ruto will fulfil his manifesto unless he reins in runaway corruption and the culprits are held to account.

 The rule of law demands that proceeds of crime be recovered and offenders charged for economic sabotage. This approach would obviate the need to burden Kenyans with taxes and more borrowing.

NATIONAL COHESION

Appointments to government positions have been undermined by the age-old problems of recycling appointees, patronage, nepotism and ethnicity. Just as worrying are senior government officials publicly advancing exclusionary ethnic politics with impunity. Ruto must rein them in.

It is also a setback that Ruto acceded to talks to assuage the opposition elite who had resorted to violent protests against his historic victory. These elitist self-serving talks could lead to constitutional amendments creating more political positions under a cynically flawed logic that this approach enhances national cohesion.

 This is an about-turn on Ruto’s part.

Ultimately national cohesion is Ruto’s pressing challenge.

 Kenya is divided on many fronts – economic, ethnic, regional and religious – a legacy of previous governments. 

Ruto needs to look beyond ethno-regional appointments. For legitimacy and transformation, he needs to ideologically reconnect with and dignify the “hustler nation”, the disenfranchised constituency that propelled him into power. Bar this, he could face an intensely contested reelection bid like his predecessors.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rigathi Gachagua’s Impeachment: A Political Conundrum for Ruto’s Administration

Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s impeachment has transformed Kenya’s political landscape, marking the first event of its kind under the 2010 Constitution.

Published

on

RigatheGachagua’s removal exposes the volatility of Kenyan politics, where regional and ethnic dynamics frequently influence shifting loyalties. Analysts urge Ruto to tread carefully to secure his hold over Mt. Kenya, a region vital to his electoral prospects.

: Explore the political crisis after Rigathi Gachagua’s impeachment, its impact on William Ruto’s leadership, and the road to Kenya’s 2027 elections.

The impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has upended Kenya’s political landscape, marking the first instance of such an event under the 2010 Constitution.

Accused of divisive politics and judicial interference, Gachagua’s ousting has ignited significant political tensions, particularly within the populous Mt. Kenya region, which has been a cornerstone of President William Ruto’s support base.

Gachagua has vocally criticised Ruto, describing his former ally as “vicious” and accusing him of orchestrating the impeachment.

 In a fiery statement, Gachagua claimed, “The man I helped to become president has betrayed me,” while also alleging threats to his safety.

 His impeachment has left the deputy presidency in limbo, with a court temporarily halting the appointment of Interior Minister Kithure Kindiki as his replacement.

Impact on Ruto’s Political Strategy

This political rift presents a dual challenge for Ruto. On one hand, it exposes cracks within the ruling coalition, with some legislators fearing backlash in their constituencies for supporting Gachagua’s removal.

 On the other, it provides opposition leaders an opportunity to capitalise on perceived disunity within the government, potentially reshaping alliances as the 2027 elections approach.

Moreover, Gachagua’s removal has highlighted the volatile nature of Kenyan politics, where loyalty often shifts based on regional and ethnic dynamics.

Analysts believe Ruto must now tread carefully to maintain his hold over Mt. Kenya, a region critical to his electoral prospects.

The Way Forward

The administration must immediately stabilize governance by resolving the court dispute over Gachagua’s replacement or reconciling with dissenting factions.

Political analysts suggest that Ruto should focus on unifying his coalition and delivering tangible results to counter opposition narratives.

As Kenya moves closer to the 2027 polls, this episode underscores the importance of political cohesion and strategic messaging. Whether Ruto can overcome this challenge or face further fallout will significantly shape the country’s political trajectory.

Continue Reading

Politics

Kenya Under Ruto: Transformative Leadership or Mounting Challenges?

Ruto’s policies have sparked mixed reactions on the social front. While he has taken a prominent role in addressing global challenges like climate change—evident in hosting a landmark summit that secured billions in clean energy investments—critics contend that his focus on international priorities has overshadowed pressing domestic concerns. Issues such as food insecurity and unemployment remain unresolved, leaving many Kenyans feeling neglected despite the administration’s ambitious global commitments.

Published

on

President Ruto has portrayed himself as a champion of reform, prioritizing transparency and economic restructuring to address systemic challenges. However, his administration grapples with the complex task of providing immediate support to struggling Kenyans while ensuring sustainable fiscal policies for long-term stability.

: Analyse President William Ruto’s leadership in Kenya, focusing on economic reforms, political strategies, and social challenges shaping the nation’s future.

Kenya’s President William Ruto, in office since September 2022, has faced mixed reviews regarding his leadership, particularly on economic, political, and social fronts.

 Bold reforms, mounting challenges, and a mixed reception among citizens have marked his administration.

Economic Landscape

Ruto inherited an economy grappling with high debt levels ($69 billion), inflation, and global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine war.

 Despite efforts to stabilise the economy, including introducing new taxes and eliminating fuel subsidies to secure loans from the IMF and World Bank, these measures have strained ordinary Kenyans.

 Household essentials, including sugar and beans, saw price hikes up to 61% and 30%, respectively. Inflation moderated to 6.7% in August 2023, but economic growth is projected to be slower than the 4.8% recorded in 2022​

.Key initiatives such as the “Hustler Fund,” aimed at empowering small-scale entrepreneurs, have not delivered the expected outcomes, with some analysts like Ken Gichinga calling Ruto’s economic policies “ineffective.”

 However, Ruto has also promoted local manufacturing and reduced reliance on imports to support job creation.​

.

Political Strategy

On the political front, Ruto has shown determination to fight corruption.

 His administration has introduced measures to track government spending and eliminate payroll fraud through a Unified Personal Identification system.

 He has also emphasised accountability, stating, “We shall levy a surcharge against any officer who causes a loss of public resources.” However, critics question the effectiveness of these reforms, especially in light of continued economic hardships​

Ruto’s administration faced opposition-led protests over rising living costs, which turned deadly, leaving 50 people dead. 

These tensions underscore the political divisions and challenges in delivering tangible benefits to Kenyans​

.Social Impact

Socially, Ruto’s policies have had polarising effects. While he champions global issues like climate change, hosting a major summit that attracted billions in clean energy investments, critics argue that his focus on international engagements has left domestic issues, such as food insecurity and unemployment, unresolved.

 Analysts like Nerima Wako-Ojiwa emphasise that many Kenyans are now struggling with basic needs like food, highlighting a disconnect between the administration’s priorities and grassroots realities​

.Broader Context and Future

Ruto has positioned himself as a reformer, focusing on transparency and economic restructuring. 

However, his administration faces the twin challenge of delivering immediate relief to struggling Kenyans while maintaining long-term fiscal responsibility. 

Supporters like Joseph Mwiti argue that transformative policies take time to bear fruit, reflecting cautious optimism about Ruto’s leadership.​

In sum, President Ruto’s tenure has been characterised by ambitious reforms and significant headwinds. The success of his administration will depend on balancing economic recovery, political stability, and social equity in the coming years.

Continue Reading

Trending